12.4The Keynesian Perspective on Market Forces

equilibrium at Er, then the Keynesian response would be to enact a policy to shift aggregate demand to the right from ADr toward ADf. If an economy is experiencing inflationary pressures with an equilibrium at Ei, then the Keynesian response would be to enact a policy response to shift aggregate demand to the left, from ADi toward ADf. The other side of Keynesian policy occurs when the economy is operating above potential GDP. In this situation, unemployment is low, but inflationary rises in the price level are a concern. The Keynesian response would be contractionary fiscal policy, using tax increases or government spending cuts to shift AD to the left. The result would be downward pressure on the price level, but very little reduction in output or very little rise in unemployment. If aggregate demand was originally at ADi in Figure 12.11, so that the economy was experiencing inflationary rises in the price level, the appropriate policy would be for government to shift aggregate demand to the left, from ADi toward ADf, which reduces the pressure for a higher price level while the economy remains at full employment. In the Keynesian economic model, too little aggregate demand brings unemployment and too much brings inflation. Thus, you can think of Keynesian economics as pursuing a “Goldilocks” level of aggregate demand: not too much, not too little, but looking for what is just right.

12.4 The Keynesian Perspective on Market Forces

LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to:

• Explain the Keynesian perspective on market forces
• Analyze the role of government policy in economic management

Ever since the birth of Keynesian economics in the 1930s, controversy has simmered over the extent to which government should play an active role in managing the economy. In the aftermath of the human devastation and misery of the Great Depression, many people—including many economists—became more aware of vulnerabilities within the market-oriented economic system. Some supporters of Keynesian economics advocated a high degree of government planning in all parts of the economy. However, Keynes himself was careful to separate the issue of aggregate demand from the issue of how well individual markets worked. He argued that individual markets for goods and services were appropriate and useful, but that sometimes that level of aggregate demand was just too low. When 10 million people are willing and able to work, but one million of them are unemployed, he argued, individual markets may be doing a perfectly good job of allocating the efforts of the nine million workers—the problem is that insufficient aggregate demand exists to support jobs for all 10 million. Thus, he believed that, while government should ensure that overall level of aggregate demand is sufficient for an economy to reach full employment, this task did not imply that the government should attempt to set prices and wages throughout the economy, nor to take over and manage large corporations or entire industries directly. Even if one accepts the Keynesian economic theory, a number of practical questions remain. In the real world, can government economists identify potential GDP accurately? Is a desired increase in aggregate demand better accomplished by a tax cut or by an increase in government spending? Given the inevitable delays and uncertainties as governments enact policies into law, is it reasonable to expect that the government can implement Keynesian economics? Can fixing a recession really be just as simple as pumping up aggregate demand? Government Budgets and Fiscal Policy will probe these issues. The Keynesian approach, with its focus on aggregate demand and sticky prices, has proved useful in understanding how the economy fluctuates in the short run and why recessions and cyclical unemployment occur. In The Neoclassical Perspective, we will consider some of the shortcomings of the Keynesian approach and why it is not especially well-suited for long- run macroeconomic analysis. BRING IT HOME The Pandemic-Induced Recession and the Keynesian Perspective The pandemic-induced recession of 2020 was unique. Unlike the Great Recession of 2007–2009 discussed in most of this chapter, it was not started by the burst of a housing bubble. It was started by a virus that caused sickness and death for millions of people worldwide and required substantial social policy in order to control its spread. In some ways, the latest recession was influenced by fluctuations in aggregate demand. At its depth in April 2020, over 20 million people were unemployed, causing a massive decline in consumption and aggregate demand. As businesses were forced to shutter or move their operations online, many were pessimistic or uncertain about the future state of the economy, causing investment to decline. The federal government attempted to correct this aggregate demand shock through small business loans, direct aid to state and local governments, expanded unemployment insurance, and stimulus checks. As a result of all these measures, the economy was able to bounce back somewhat over the remainder of 2020. However, even at the start of 2022, millions of people remained out of work as new variants threatened to upend the economy once again. The Keynesian perspective would have economic policy continue to focus on aggregate and restoring confidence in the economy. President Biden’s proposals largely reflect these goals, but with millions of workers still out of the labor market and a virus that is still not contained, it remains to be seen whether those policy prescriptions will be enough “medicine” to bring the economy back to normalcy.

Key Terms

contractionary fiscal policy tax increases or cuts in government spending designed to decrease aggregate demand and reduce inflationary pressures coordination argument downward wage and price flexibility requires perfect information about the level of lower compensation acceptable to other laborers and market participants disposable income income after taxes expansionary fiscal policy tax cuts or increases in government spending designed to stimulate aggregate demand and move the economy out of recession expenditure multiplier Keynesian concept that asserts that a change in autonomous spending causes a more than proportionate change in real GDP inflationary gap equilibrium at a level of output above potential GDP macroeconomic externality occurs when what happens at the macro level is different from what happens at the micro level; an example would be where, because of the coordination argument, upward sloping supply curves for firms become a flat aggregate supply curve, illustrating that the price level cannot fall to stimulate aggregate demand menu costs costs firms face in changing prices Phillips curve the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation real GDP the amount of goods and services actually sold in a nation recessionary gap equilibrium at a level of output below potential GDP sticky wages and prices a situation where wages and prices do not fall in response to a decrease in demand, or do not rise in response to an increase in demand

Key Concepts and Summary

12.1 Aggregate Demand in Keynesian Analysis

Aggregate demand is the sum of four components: consumption, investment, government spending, and net exports. Consumption will change for a number of reasons, including movements in income, taxes, expectations about future income, and changes in wealth levels. Investment will change in response to its expected profitability, which in turn is shaped by expectations about future economic growth, the creation of new technologies, the price of key inputs, and tax incentives for investment. Investment will also change when interest rates rise or fall. Political considerations determine government spending and taxes. Exports and imports change according to relative growth rates and prices between two economies.

12.2 The Building Blocks of Keynesian Analysis

Keynesian economics is based on two main ideas: (1) aggregate demand is more likely than aggregate supply to be the primary cause of a short-run economic event like a recession; (2) wages and prices can be sticky, and so, in an economic downturn, unemployment can result. The latter is an example of a macroeconomic externality. While surpluses cause prices to fall at the micro level, they do not necessarily at the macro level. Instead the adjustment to a decrease in demand occurs only through decreased quantities. One reason why prices may be sticky is menu costs, the costs of changing prices. These include internal costs a business faces in changing prices in terms of labeling, recordkeeping, and accounting, and also the costs of communicating the price change to (possibly unhappy) customers. Keynesians also believe in the existence of the expenditure multiplier—the notion that a change in autonomous expenditure causes a more than proportionate change in GDP.

12.3 The Phillips Curve

A Phillips curve shows the tradeoff between unemployment and inflation in an economy. From a Keynesian viewpoint, the Phillips curve should slope down so that higher unemployment means lower inflation, and vice versa. However, a downward-sloping Phillips curve is a short-term relationship that may shift after a few years.