14.2Wages and Employment in an Imperfectly Competitive Labor Market
FIGURE 14.7The Wage RateIn a competitive , the wage and employment level are determined where the for labor equals the supply of labor. Like all prices, the wage rate is determined through the interaction of supply and in the . Thus, we can see in for competitive markets the wage rate and number of workers hired. The FRED database has a great deal of data on labor markets, starting at the wage rate and number of workers hired (https://openstax.org/l/cat10). The United States Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes The Current Population Survey, which is a monthly survey of households (you can find a link to it by going to the FRED database found in the previous link), which provides data on labor supply, including numerous measures of the labor force size (disaggregated by age, gender and educational attainment), labor force participation rates for different demographic groups, and employment. It also includes more than 3,500 measures of earnings by different demographic groups. The Current Employment Statistics, which is a survey of businesses, offers alternative estimates of employment across all sectors of the economy. The FRED database, found in the previous link, also has a link labeled "Productivity and Costs" has a wide range of data on productivity, labor costs, and profits across the business sector.
14.2 Wages and Employment in an Imperfectly Competitive Labor Market
LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Define power
- Explain how labor markets determine wages and employment, where employers have power
In the chapters on , we observed that while economists use the of as an ideal case of , there are very few examples of perfectly competitive industries in the real world. What about labor markets? How many labor markets are perfectly competitive? There are probably more examples of perfectly competitive labor markets than perfectly competitive product markets, but that doesn’t mean that all labor markets are competitive. When a job applicant is bargaining with an employer for a position, the applicant is often at a disadvantage—needing the job more than the employer needs that particular applicant. John Bates Clark (1847–1938), often named as the first great American economist, wrote in 1907: “In the making of the wages contract the individual laborer is always at a disadvantage. He has something which he is obliged to sell and which his employer is not obliged to take, since he [that is, the employer] can reject single men with impunity.” To give workers more power, the U.S. government has passed, in response to years of labor protests, a number of laws to create a more equal balance of power between workers and employers. These laws include some of the following:
- Setting minimum hourly wages
- Setting maximum hours of work (at least before employers pay overtime rates)
- Prohibiting child labor
- Regulating health and safety conditions in the workplace
- Preventing on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, and age
- Requiring employers to provide family leave
- Requiring employers to give advance notice of layoffs
- Covering workers with unemployment
- Setting a limit on the number of immigrant workers from other countries
lists some prominent U.S. workplace protection laws. Many of the laws listed in the table were only the start of regulations in these areas and have been followed, over time, by other related laws, regulations, and court rulings. Law Protection National Labor- Management Relations Act of 1935 (the “Wagner Act”) Establishes procedures for establishing a union that firms are obligated to follow; sets up the National Labor Relations Board for deciding disputes Under Title III, establishes a state-run system of unemployment , in which workers pay into a state fund when they are employed and received benefits for a time when they are unemployed Social Security Act of 1935 Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Establishes the , limits on child labor, and rules requiring payment of overtime pay for those in jobs that are paid by the hour and exceed 40 hours per week Allows states to decide whether all workers at a can be required to join a union as a condition of employment; in the case of a disruptive union strike, permits the president to declare a “cooling-off period” during which workers have to return to work Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VII of the Act prohibits in employment on the basis of race, gender, national origin, religion, or sexual orientation Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970 Creates the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (), which protects workers from physical harm in the workplace Employee Retirement and Security Act of 1974 Regulates employee pension rules and benefits Pregnancy Act of 1978 Prohibits against women in the workplace who are planning to get pregnant or who are returning to work after pregnancy TABLE 14.4Prominent U.S. Workplace Protection Laws Law Protection Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 Prohibits hiring of illegal immigrants; requires employers to ask for proof of citizenship; protects rights of legal immigrants Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 Requires employers with more than 100 employees to provide written notice 60 days before plant closings or large layoffs Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 Prohibits against those with disabilities and requires reasonable accommodations for them on the job Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 Allows employees to take up to 12 weeks of unpaid leave per year for family reasons, including birth or family illness Pension Protection Act of 2006 Penalizes firms for underfunding their pension plans and gives employees more information about their pension accounts Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 Restores protection for pay claims on the basis of sex, race, national origin, age, religion, or disability TABLE 14.4Prominent U.S. Workplace Protection Laws There are two sources of imperfect competition in labor markets. These are side sources, that is, labor market power by employers, and supply side sources: labor market power by employees. In this section we will discuss the former. In the next section we will discuss the latter. A competitive labor market is one where there are many potential employers for a given type of worker, say a secretary or an accountant. Suppose there is only one employer in a labor market. Because that employer has no direct competition in hiring, if they offer lower wages than would exist in a competitive market, employees will have few options. If they want a job, they must accept the offered wage rate. Since the employer is exploiting its market power, we call the firm a monopsony, a term introduced and widely discussed by Joan Robinson (though she credited scholar Bertrand Hallward with invention of the word). The classical example of monopsony is the sole coal company in a West Virginia town. If coal miners want to work, they must accept what the coal company is paying. This is not the only example of monopsony. Think about surgical nurses in a town with only one hospital. A situation in which employers have at least some market power over potential employees is not that unusual. After all, most firms have many employees while there is only one employer. Thus, even if there is some competition for workers, it may not feel that way to potential employees unless they do their research and find the opposite. How does market power by an employer affect labor market outcomes? Intuitively, one might think that wages will be lower than in a competitive labor market. Let’s prove it. We will tell the story for a monopsonist, but the results will be qualitatively similar, although less extreme, for any firm with labor market power. Think back to monopoly. The good news for the firm is that because the monopolist is the sole supplier in the market, it can charge any price it wishes. The bad news is that if it wants to sell a greater quantity of output, it must lower the price it charges. Monopsony is analogous. Because the monopsonist is the sole employer in a labor market, it can offer any wage that it wishes. However, because they face the market supply curve for labor, if they want to hire more workers, they must raise the wage they pay. This creates a quandary, which we can understand by introducing a new concept: the marginal cost of labor. The marginal cost of labor is the cost to the firm of hiring one more worker. However, here is the thing: we assume that the firm is determining how many workers to hire in total. They are not hiring sequentially. Let’s look how this plays out with the example in . Supply of Labor 1 2 3 4 5 Wage Rate $1 per hour $2 per hour $3 per hour $4 per hour $5 per hour of Labor $1 $4 $9 $16 $25 of Labor $1 $3 $5 $7 $9 TABLE 14.5The of Labor There are a couple of things to notice from the table. First, the increases faster than the wage rate. In fact, for any number of workers more than one, the of labor is greater than the wage. This is because to hire one more worker requires paying a higher wage rate, not just for the new worker but for all the previous hires also. We can see this graphically in .
FIGURE 14.8The of LaborSince monopsonies are the sole demander for labor, they face the supply curve for labor. In order to increase employment they must raise the wage they pay not just for new workers, but for all the existing workers they could have hired at the previous lower wage. As a result, the of hiring additional labor is greater than the wage, and thus for any level of employment (above the first worker), MCL is above the Supply of Labor.
FIGURE 14.9Labor Outcomes Under MonopsonyA will hire workers up to the point Lm where its for labor equals the of additional labor, paying the wage Wm given by the supply curve of labor necessary to obtain Lm workers. If the wants to maximize profits, it will hire labor up to the point Lm where DL = VMP (or MRP) = MCL, as shows. Then, the supply curve for labor shows the wage the will have to pay to attract Lm workers. Graphically, we can draw a vertical line up from Lm to the Supply Curve for the label and then read the wage Wm off the vertical axis to the left. How does this outcome compare to what would occur in a perfectly competitive ? A competitive would operate where DL = SL, hiring Lc workers and paying Wc wage. In other words, under employers hire fewer workers and pay a lower wage. While pure may be rare, many employers have some degree of power in labor markets. The outcomes for those employers will be qualitatively similar though not as extreme as .
FIGURE 14.10Comparison of outcomes: vs. Perfect CompetitionA hires fewer workers (Lm) than would be hired in a competitive (Lc). In exploiting its power, the can also pay a lower wage (Wm) than workers would earn in a competitive (Wc).
14.3 Market Power on the Supply Side of Labor Markets: Unions
LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to:
- Explain the concept of labor unions, including membership levels and wages
- Evaluate arguments for and against labor unions
- Analyze reasons for the decline in U.S. union membership
A labor union is an organization of workers that negotiates with employers over wages and working conditions. A labor union seeks to change the balance of power between employers and workers by requiring employers to deal with workers collectively, rather than as individuals. As such, a labor union operates like a in a . We sometimes call negotiations between unions and firms . The subject of labor unions can be controversial. Supporters of labor unions view them as the workers’ primary line of defense against efforts by profit-seeking firms to hold down wages and benefits. Critics of labor unions view them as having a tendency to grab as much as they can in the short term, even if it means injuring workers in the by driving firms into bankruptcy or by blocking the new technologies and methods that lead to economic growth. We will start with some facts about union membership in the United States.
Facts about Union Membership and Pay
According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, about 10.3% of all U.S. workers belong to unions. This represents nearly a 50% reduction since 1983 (the earliest year for which comparable data are available),
Text from Principles of Microeconomics 3e, OpenStax, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Access for free at openstax.org.
My notes
No notes yet on this page.
