Business League logoBusiness League
Chapter 5: Elasticity

5.4Elasticity in Areas Other Than Price

5.4 Elasticity in Areas Other Than Price

LEARNING OBJECTIVES By the end of this section, you will be able to:

  • Calculate the of and the
  • Calculate the in labor and markets through an understanding of the of labor supply and the
  • Apply concepts of to real-world situations

The basic idea of —how a percentage change in one variable causes a percentage change in another variable—does not just apply to the responsiveness of and to changes in the of a product. Recall that (Qd) depends on , tastes and preferences, the prices of related goods, and so on, as well as . Similarly, (Qs) depends on factors such as the cost of , as well as . We can measure for any determinant of and quantity demanded, not just the price.

Income Elasticity of Demand

The of is the percentage change in divided by the percentage change in . For most products, most of the time, the of is positive: that is, a rise in will cause an increase in the . This pattern is common enough that we refer to these goods as normal goods. However, for a few goods, an increase in means that one might purchase less of the good. For example, those with a higher might buy fewer hamburgers, because they are buying more steak instead, or those with a higher income might buy less cheap wine and more imported beer. When the income elasticity of demand is negative, we call the good an inferior good. We introduced the concepts of normal and inferior goods in Demand and Supply. A higher level of income causes a demand curve to shift to the right for a normal good, which means that the income elasticity of demand is positive. How far the demand shifts depends on the income elasticity of demand. A higher income elasticity means a larger shift. However, for an inferior good, that is, when the income elasticity of demand is negative, a higher level of income would cause the demand curve for that good to shift to the left. Again, how much it shifts depends on how large the (negative) income elasticity is.

Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand

A change in the of one good can shift the for another good. If the two goods are , like bread and peanut butter, then a drop in the of one good will lead to an increase in the of the other good. However, if the two goods are substitutes, like plane tickets and train tickets, then a drop in the of one good will cause people to substitute toward that good, and to reduce consumption of the other good. Cheaper plane tickets lead to fewer train tickets, and vice versa. The puts some meat on the bones of these ideas. The term “cross-” refers to the idea that the of one good is affecting the of a different good. Specifically, the is the percentage change in the quantity of good A that is demanded as a result of a percentage change in the of good B. Substitute goods have positive cross-price elasticities of demand: if good A is a substitute for good B, like coffee and tea, then a higher price for B will mean a greater quantity consumed of A. Complement goods have negative cross-price elasticities: if good A is a complement for good B, like coffee and sugar, then a higher price for B will mean a lower quantity consumed of A.

Elasticity in Labor and Financial Capital Markets

The concept of applies to any , not just markets for goods and services. In the , for example, the —that is, the percentage change in hours worked divided by the percentage change in wages—will reflect the shape of the labor supply curve. Specifically: The for teenage workers is generally fairly elastic: that is, a certain percentage change in wages will lead to a larger percentage change in the quantity of hours worked. Conversely, the for adult workers in their thirties and forties is fairly inelastic. When wages move up or down by a certain percentage amount, the quantity of hours that adults in their prime earning years are willing to supply changes but by a lesser percentage amount. In markets for , the —that is, the percentage change in the quantity of savings divided by the percentage change in interest rates—will describe the shape of the supply curve for . That is: Sometimes laws are proposed that seek to increase the quantity of savings by offering tax breaks so that the return on savings is higher. Such a policy will have a comparatively large impact on increasing the quantity saved if the supply curve for is elastic, because then a given percentage increase in the return to savings will cause a higher percentage increase in the quantity of savings. However, if the supply curve for is highly inelastic, then a percentage increase in the return to savings will cause only a small increase in the quantity of savings. The evidence on the supply curve of is controversial but, at least in the short run, the elasticity of savings with respect to the interest rate appears fairly inelastic.

Expanding the Concept of Elasticity

The concept does not even need to relate to a typical supply or at all. For example, imagine that you are studying whether the Internal should spend more on auditing tax returns. We can frame the question in terms of the of tax collections with respect to spending on tax enforcement; that is, what is the percentage change in tax collections derived from a given percentage change in spending on tax enforcement? With all of the concepts that we have just described, some of which are in , the possibility of confusion arises. When you hear the phrases “ of ” or “ of supply,” they refer to the with respect to . Sometimes, either to be extremely clear or because economists are discussing a wide variety of elasticities, we will call the of or the the or the “ of with respect to price.” Similarly, economists sometimes use the term elasticity of supply or the supply elasticity, to avoid any possibility of confusion, the price elasticity of supply or “the elasticity of supply with respect to price.” However, in whatever context, the idea of elasticity always refers to percentage change in one variable, almost always a price or money variable, and how it causes a percentage change in another variable, typically a quantity variable of some kind. TABLE 5.4Formulas for Calculating Elasticity TABLE 5.4Formulas for Calculating Elasticity BRING IT HOME That Will Be How Much? How did the 60% price increase in 2011 end up for Netflix? It has been a very bumpy ride. Before the price increase, there were about 24.6 million U.S. subscribers. After the price increase, 810,000 infuriated U.S. consumers canceled their Netflix subscriptions, dropping the total number of subscribers to 23.79 million. Fast forward to June 2013, when there were 36 million streaming Netflix subscribers in the United States. This was an increase of 11.4 million subscribers since the price increase—an average per quarter growth of about 1.6 million. This growth is less than the 2 million per quarter increases Netflix experienced in the fourth quarter of 2010 and the first quarter of 2011. During the first year after the price increase, the firm’s stock price (a measure of future expectations for the firm) fell from about $33.60 per share per share to just under $7.80. By the end of 2016, however, the stock price was at $123 per share. By the end of 2021, the stock price was just over $600 per share, and Netflix had more than 214 million subscribers in fifty countries. What happened? Obviously, Netflix company officials understood the law of demand. Company officials reported, when announcing the price increase, this could result in the loss of about 600,000 existing subscribers. Using the elasticity of demand formula, it is easy to see company officials expected an inelastic response: In addition, Netflix officials had anticipated the price increase would have little impact on attracting new customers. Netflix anticipated adding up to 1.29 million new subscribers in the third quarter of 2011. It is true this was slower growth than the firm had experienced—about 2 million per quarter. Why was the estimate of customers leaving so far off? In the more than two decades since Netflix had been founded, there was an increase in the number of close, but not perfect, substitutes. Consumers now had choices ranging from Vudu, Amazon Prime, Hulu, and Redbox, to retail stores. Jaime Weinman reported in Maclean’s that Redbox kiosks are “a five-minute drive for less from 68 percent of Americans, and it seems that many people still find a five-minute drive more convenient than loading up a movie online.” It seems that in 2012, many consumers still preferred a physical DVD disk over streaming video. What missteps did the Netflix management make? In addition to misjudging the elasticity of demand, by failing to account for close substitutes, it seems they may have also misjudged customers’ preferences and tastes. However, the very substantial increase over time in the number of Netflix subscribers suggests that the preference for streaming video may well have overtaken the preference for physical DVD disks. Netflix, the source of numerous late night talk show laughs and jabs in 2011, may yet have the last laugh.

Key Terms

when a given percent change in leads to an equal percentage change in or supplied the percentage change in the quantity of good A that is demanded as a result of a percentage change in the of good B when the of is greater than one, indicating a high responsiveness of or supplied to changes in when the elasticity of either supply is greater than one, indicating a high responsiveness of quantity demanded or supplied to changes in price elasticity an economics concept that measures responsiveness of one variable to changes in another variable elasticity of savings the percentage change in the quantity of savings divided by the percentage change in interest rates inelastic demand when the elasticity of demand is less than one, indicating that a 1 percent increase in price paid by the consumer leads to less than a 1 percent change in purchases (and vice versa); this indicates a low responsiveness by consumers to price changes inelastic supply when the elasticity of supply is less than one, indicating that a 1 percent increase in price paid to the firm will result in a less than 1 percent increase in production by the firm; this indicates a low responsiveness of the firm to price increases (and vice versa if prices drop) infinite elasticity the extremely elastic situation of demand or supply where quantity changes by an infinite amount in response to any change in price; horizontal in appearance perfect elasticity see infinite elasticity perfect inelasticity see zero elasticity price elasticity the relationship between the percent change in price resulting in a corresponding percentage change in the quantity demanded or supplied price elasticity of demand percentage change in the quantity demanded of a good or service divided the percentage change in price price elasticity of supply percentage change in the quantity supplied divided by the percentage change in price tax incidence manner in which the tax burden is divided between buyers and sellers unitary elasticity when the calculated elasticity is equal to one indicating that a change in the price of the good or service results in a proportional change in the quantity demanded or supplied wage elasticity of labor supply the percentage change in hours worked divided by the percentage change in wages zero inelasticity the highly inelastic case of demand or supply in which a percentage change in price, no matter how large, results in zero change in the quantity; vertical in appearance

Key Concepts and Summary

5.1 Price Elasticity of Demand and Price Elasticity of Supply

measures the responsiveness of the or supplied of a good to a change in its . We compute it as the percentage change in (or supplied) divided by the percentage change in . We can describe as elastic (or very responsive), unit elastic, or inelastic (not very responsive). or supply curves indicate that or supplied respond to changes in a greater than proportional manner. An or supply curve is one where a given percentage change in will cause a smaller percentage change in or supplied. A unitary elasticity means that a given percentage change in price leads to an equal percentage change in quantity demanded or supplied.

5.2 Polar Cases of Elasticity and Constant Elasticity

Infinite or refers to the extreme case where either the or supplied

Simpler explanation — Cambridge AS & A Level Economics

(PED) measures the responsiveness of the for a product following a change in the of the product. More simply, PED describes how the is affected by a change in a product’s . This is the only change that occurs, in other words, or other things equal. If is elastic, then a small change in will result in a relatively larger change in . On the other hand, if there is a large change in and a far smaller change in , then demand is price inelastic.

An example helps to explain this. PED is calculated as the percentage change in divided by the percentage change in of the product: PED = % change in % change in Using examples of changes for two products called product A and product B (see ), assume that both of these unrelated products are currently priced at $100 and for them is 1 000 units per month. Consider what might happen to the for A and B if the rises to $105. The of product A only falls from 1 000 to 990, whereas the of product B falls from 1 000 to 900. By putting these values into the PED equation, we can calculate the .

Product A = % change in of A % change in of A = −1 % +5 % = ( −)0 . 2 Product B = % change in of B % change in of B = −10 % +5 % = ( −)2 . 0 In both cases the result is a negative figure. This is because of the negative (or inverse) relationship between and ; as the goes up, the goes down and as the decreases, the increases. (Economists usually refer to PED in absolute terms by ignoring the negative sign).

Text from Principles of Microeconomics 3e, OpenStax, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Access for free at openstax.org.

My notes

No notes yet on this page.