Key Terms
Key Terms
additional costs incurred by third parties outside the process when a unit of output is produced the full spectrum of animal and plant genetic material laws that specify allowable quantities of pollution and that also may detail which pollution-control technologies one must use a exchange that affects a third party who is outside or “external” to the exchange; sometimes called a “” externalities that cross national borders and that a single nation acting alone cannot resolve When the on its own does not allocate resources efficiently in a way that balances and benefits; externalities are one example of a marketable permit program a permit that allows a firm to emit a certain amount of pollution; firms with more permits than pollution can sell the remaining permits to other firms negative externality a situation where a third party, outside the transaction, suffers from a market transaction by others pollution charge a tax imposed on the quantity of pollution that a firm emits; also called a pollution tax positive externality a situation where a third party, outside the transaction, benefits from a market transaction by others property rights the legal rights of ownership on which others are not allowed to infringe without paying compensation social costs costs that include both the private costs incurred by firms and also additional costs incurred by third parties outside the production process, like costs of pollution spillover see externality
Key Concepts and Summary
12.1 The Economics of Pollution
Economic can cause environmental damage. This tradeoff arises for all countries, whether high- or low-, and whether their economies are -oriented or command-oriented. An occurs when an exchange between a buyer and seller has an impact on a third party who is not part of the exchange. An , which is sometimes also called a , can have a negative or a positive impact on the third party. If those parties imposing a on others had to account for the broader social cost of their behavior, they would have an incentive to reduce the of whatever is causing the . In the case of a , the third party obtains benefits from the exchange between a buyer and a seller, but they are not paying for these benefits. If this is the case, then markets would tend to under produce output because suppliers are not aware of the additional from others. If the parties generating benefits to others would somehow receive compensation for these external benefits, they would have an incentive to increase production of whatever is causing the positive externality. In either case, because resources are not being allocated efficiently, the externality leads to market failure.
12.2 Command-and-Control Regulation
sets specific limits for pollution emissions and/or specific pollution-control technologies that firms must use. Although such regulations have helped to protect the environment, they have three shortcomings: they provide no incentive for going beyond the limits they set; they offer limited flexibility on where and how to reduce pollution; and they often have politically-motivated loopholes.
12.3 Market-Oriented Environmental Tools
Examples of -oriented environmental policies, also called programs, include pollution
Text from Principles of Microeconomics 3e, OpenStax, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Access for free at openstax.org.
My notes
No notes yet on this page.
