Business League logoBusiness League
Chapter 12: Environmental Protection and Negative Externalities

Self-Check Questions

charges, marketable permits, and better-defined . -oriented environmental policies include taxes, markets, and so that those who impose negative externalities must face the social cost.

12.4 The Benefits and Costs of U.S. Environmental Laws

We can make a strong case, taken as a whole, that the benefits of U.S. environmental regulation have outweighed the costs. As the extent of environment regulation increases, additional expenditures on environmental protection will probably have increasing marginal costs and decreasing marginal benefits. This pattern suggests that the flexibility and cost savings of -oriented environmental policies will become more important.

12.5 International Environmental Issues

Certain global environmental issues, such as global warming and , spill over national borders and require addressing with some form of international agreement.

12.6 The Tradeoff between Economic Output and Environmental Protection

Depending on their different levels and political preferences, countries are likely to make different choices about —that is, the choice between economic output and environmental protection along the possibility frontier. However, all countries should prefer to make a choice that shows —that is, the choice is somewhere on the possibility frontier rather than inside it. Revisit Choice in a World of for more on these terms.

Self-Check Questions

1 . Identify the following situations as an example of a negative or a : a. You are a birder (bird watcher), and your neighbor has put up several birdhouses in the yard as well as planting trees and flowers that attract birds. b. Your neighbor paints his house a hideous color. c. Investments in private education raise your country’s . d. Trash dumped upstream flows downstream right past your home. e. Your roommate is a smoker, but you are a nonsmoker. 2 . Identify whether the supply curve will shift right or left or will stay the same for the following: a. Firms in an industry are required to pay a fine for their carbon dioxide emissions. b. Companies are sued for polluting the water in a river. c. Power plants in a specific city are not required to address the impact of their air quality emissions. d. Companies that use fracking to remove oil and gas from rock are required to clean up the damage. 3 . For each of your answers to Exercise 12.2, will rise or fall or stay the same? 4 . provides the supply and conditions for a manufacturing . The third column represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column represents the supply curve when the is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Identify the before the social cost of is included and after the social cost of is included. without paying the after paying the cost of the pollution cost of the pollution $10 450 400 250 $15 440 440 290 $20 430 480 330 $25 420 520 370 $30 410 560 410 TABLE 12.5 5 . Consider two approaches to reducing emissions of CO2 into the environment from manufacturing industries in the United States. In the first approach, the U.S. government makes it a policy to use only predetermined technologies. In the second approach, the U.S. government determines which technologies are cleaner and subsidizes their use. Of the two approaches, which is the command-and-control policy? 6 . Classify the following pollution-control policies as command-and-control or incentive based. a. A state emissions tax on the quantity of carbon emitted by each . b. The federal government requires domestic auto companies to improve car emissions by 2020. c. The EPA sets national standards for water quality. d. A city sells permits to firms that allow them to emit a specified quantity of pollution. e. The federal government pays fishermen to preserve salmon. 7 . An emissions tax on a quantity of emissions from a firm is not a command-and-control approach to reducing pollution. Why? 8 . Four firms called Elm, Maple, Oak, and Cherry, produce wooden chairs. However, they also produce a great deal of garbage (a mixture of glue, varnish, sandpaper, and wood scraps). The first row of shows the total amount of garbage (in tons) that each currently produces. The other rows of the table show the cost of reducing garbage produced by the first five tons, the second five tons, and so on. First, calculate the cost of requiring each to reduce the weight of its garbage by one-fourth. Now, imagine that the government issues marketable permits for the current level of garbage, but the permits will shrink the weight of allowable garbage for each by one-fourth. What will be the result of this alternative approach to reducing pollution? Elm Maple Oak Cherry Current of garbage (in tons) 20 40 60 80 Cost of reducing garbage by first five tons $5,500 $6,300 $7,200 $3,000 Cost of reducing garbage by second five tons $6,000 $7,200 $7,500 $4,000 Cost of reducing garbage by third five tons $6,500 $8,100 $7,800 $5,000 TABLE 12.6 Elm Maple Oak Cherry Cost of reducing garbage by fourth five tons $7,000 $9,000 $8,100 $6,000 Cost of reducing garbage by fifth five tons $0 $9,900 $8,400 $7,000 TABLE 12.6 9 . The rows in show three -oriented tools for reducing pollution. The columns of the table show three complaints about . Fill in the table by stating briefly how each -oriented tool addresses each of the three concerns. Incentives to Flexibility about Where and How Political Process Creates Loopholes and Exceptions Go Beyond Pollution Will Be Reduced Pollution Charges Marketable Permits TABLE 12.7 10 . Suppose a city releases 16 million gallons of raw sewage into a nearby lake. shows the total costs of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits of doing so. (Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits.) (in thousands of dollars) Total Benefits (in thousands of dollars) 16 million gallons Current situation Current situation 12 million gallons 50 800 8 million gallons 150 1300 4 million gallons 500 1650 0 gallons 1200 1900 TABLE 12.8 a. Using the information in , calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this city. See , Costs and Industry if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs. b. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? c. Why not just pass a law that firms can emit zero sewage? After all, the total benefits of zero emissions exceed the total costs. 11 . The state of Colorado requires oil and gas companies who use fracking techniques to return the land to its original condition after the oil and gas extractions. shows the and total benefits (in dollars) of this policy. Land Restored (in acres) Total Benefit 0 $0 $0 100 $20 $140 200 $80 $240 300 $160 $320 400 $280 $380 TABLE 12.9 a. Calculate the and the marginal benefit at each quantity (acre) of land restored. See , Costs and Industry if you need a refresher on how to calculate marginal costs and benefits. b. If we apply , what is the optimal amount of land to be restored? 12 . Consider the case of global environmental problems that spill across international borders as a of the sort studied in and . Say that there are two countries, A and B. Each country can choose whether to protect the environment, at a cost of 10, or not to protect it, at a cost of zero. If one country decides to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 16, but the benefit is divided equally between the two countries. If both countries decide to protect the environment, there is a benefit of 32, which is divided equally between the two countries. a. In , fill in the costs, benefits, and total payoffs to the countries of the following decisions. Explain why, without some international agreement, they are likely to end up with neither country acting to protect the environment. Country B Protect Not Protect Protect Country A Not Protect TABLE 12.10 13 . A country called Sherwood is very heavily covered with a forest of 50,000 trees. There are proposals to clear some of Sherwood’s forest and grow corn, but obtaining this additional economic output will have an environmental cost from reducing the number of trees. shows possible combinations of economic output and environmental protection. Combos Corn Bushels (thousands) Number of Trees (thousands) P 9 1 Q 2 7.5 R 7 5 S 2 1 T 6 2 TABLE 12.11 a. Sketch a graph of a possibility frontier with environmental quality on the horizontal axis, measured by the number of trees, and the quantity of economic output, measured in corn, on the vertical axis. b. Which choices display ? How can you tell? c. Which choices show ? How can you tell? d. In the choice between T and R, decide which one is better. Why? e. In the choice between T and S, can you say which one is better, and why? f. If you had to guess, which choice would you think is more likely to represent a command-and-control environmental policy and which choice is more likely to represent a -oriented environmental policy, choice Q or S? Why?

Review Questions

14 . What is an ? 15 . Give an example of a and an example of a . 16 . What is the difference between private costs and ? 17 . In a without environmental regulations, will the supply curve for a account for private costs, external costs, both, or neither? Explain. 18 . What is command-and-control environmental regulation? 19 . What are the three problems that economists have noted with regard to ? 20 . What is a and what incentive does it provide for a to take external costs into account? 21 . What is a marketable permit and what incentive does it provide for a to account for external costs? 22 . What are better-defined and what incentive do they provide to account for external costs? 23 . As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect marginal costs of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not? 24 . As the extent of environmental protection expands, would you expect the marginal benefits of environmental protection to rise or fall? Why or why not? 25 . What are the economic tradeoffs between low- and high-income countries in international conferences on global environmental damage?

Text from Principles of Microeconomics 3e, OpenStax, licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Access for free at openstax.org.

My notes

No notes yet on this page.